🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold action to restrict social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring intently to see if this strategy will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Momentum

In Europe, a rising chorus of nations are moving toward comparable measures.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that phones and networks are "taking away our children's childhood". Legislation may be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is developing a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential measures on the table".
• In Spain, the president has urged the legislature to enact a proposal raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has suggested a similar move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended families to prevent their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is provided. While it highlights of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age barrier is a good foundation," said the European lawmaker behind the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Eye

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a future ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in strong data".

Last year, support built behind a proposal to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the administration committed to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the family of a teenager who was lost after viewing dangerous online content contends that a strict age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"This ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for children," stated a prominent peer.

The US: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, regulation is largely occurring at the local level due to country-wide gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has passed a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a regulation restricting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with any further access requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced laws mandating adult authorization for under-16s to set up social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from some individuals to follow Australia's example, a federal ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Apart from Europe and the US, other nations are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, world bodies strike a more measured tone. Unicef has warned that social media bans have downsides and "might prove counterproductive". The body notes that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

While this worldwide conversation continues, the steps of this nation and others show that states globally are less and less prepared to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.